The Canary goes after legal Twitterati royalty

Barristers Adam Wagner and Jolyon Maugham QC targeted by left-wing news website following comments made on social media

Two legal-goliaths of the Twittersphere have come under fire after comments they made on the social media platform attracted the attention of left-wing news website The Canary.

Adam Wagner, a barrister at human rights set Doughty Street Chambers, and Jolyon Maugham QC, a tax specialist at Devereux, were targeted by the website (and its outspoken editor) in two separate incidents this week.

First up, Wagner. The much-followed public law specialist drew criticism on Twitter after he appeared to suggest that some Labour supporters were citing the ‘Windrush Scandal’ in response to accusations of antisemitism within the party.

The initial tweet was picked up on by The Canary’s editor-in-chief Kerry-Anne Mendoza, who described it as “sheer ignorance” and “beggars belief”.

According to Wagner, Mendoza’s “misrepresented” response triggered a flurry of online abuse, some of which suggested he was “a racist”.

In a series of follow-up tweets, the Doughty Street barrister stressed he wasn’t trying to play down the seriousness of the immigration scandal, but rather highlighting, in his opinion, the unconvincing “what about Windrush” argument put forward by certain Labour supporters in response to claims of antisemitism.

The Canary’s barrister-bashing didn’t stop there.

In a separate spat, the website itself ran a piece yesterday slamming Maugham after he said it was wrong to say the Conservative government was “waging war” on the low paid or poor.

Here’s the backstory: on Monday, the Centre for Labour and Social Studies shared a video of journalist and political commentator Owen Jones on Twitter. In it, Jones suggested the Conservatives had “waged war” on the poor. Taking issue with Jones’ language, Maugham tweeted:

The Canary in turn took issue with the Devereux barrister’s tweet.

In an article titled, ‘The barrister who said the DWP isn’t ‘waging war’ on the poor should have checked his tweet history’, the website said: “There were several problems with his [Maugham] assertion. The one that really sticks out is that Maugham himself has — you guessed it — previously described the Tories as waging war on the electorate.” The site then went on to produce examples of where Maugham had used similar rhetoric in reference to Brexit and millennials.

Users on Twitter also pulled up Maugham on this:

Maugham, having the last word on this, conceded that he had used the term “war” in the past and that he “should have been more aware” of the language he was using at the time of his older tweets, but defended his record on expressing increasing concern over loose “political discourse”.

Maugham told Legal Cheek: “Most lawyers — certainly most lawyers active on social media — will understand that if they get involved in politics they will attract a very different type of, and these days rather more vigorous, engagement to that they are used to. That’s the reality — and it’s one I’m pretty relaxed about. If you don’t like the heat you can always stay out of the kitchen.” He continued:

“That having been said, there is a better world in which a call for less corrosive political discourse doesn’t precipitate a welter of aggressive and disingenuous responses.”

The post The Canary goes after legal Twitterati royalty appeared first on Legal Cheek.

Pop in for a coffee and a chat

Whitestone Solicitors offices... in some cases we can come out to you.

Drop us a message